Vem aí o 11° Griffe Show, em BH

De: 15 jun 2012 por Nina

A próxima edição do Griffe Show será realizada entre os dias 27 de maio e 13 de junho, no Minascentro, em Belo Horizonte (MG).

Vem aí o 11° Griffe Show, em BH

O evento apresenta ao público mineiro marcas renomadas no Brasil e no mundo, além dos novos talentos da música mineira e também algumas grifes que estão se destacando em outros mercados, como Rio de Janeiro e São Paulo, com até 75% de desconto, incluindo coleções atuais e muitas novidades. Já são mais de 50 marcas confirmadas. Entre elas, 12 novos talentos que vem despontando no segmento em vários lugares do Brasil.

Entre os confirmados estão: Atualle, Aysle, Bibe, Boundless, Bulcci Eyewear, Caridon, Carmen Steffens, Cavalera, Colcci, Eclectic, Equus, Everlast, Farm, Faven, Florença, Fórum Lingerie, Jack’s Club Joana Paixão, K9, Lacoste Footwear, Le Soulier, Lilica e Tigor, London Man, Maison Élan com Valentino, Seven, Diesel, Prada, Gucci, e Burberry, Mau Mau, Olium, Patachou, Pavilhão, Polo USA, Ricardo Ribeiro, RON, Ronaldo Fraga para Filhotes, Scanner, Simplesmente Diferente, Sixties, Shop 126, Sketch, Terra Blue, Totem, WG, Witness, Zinzane. E algumas surpresas que não queremos divulgar e que o consumidor terá que conferir “in loco”.

Uma das novidades desta edição é a presença da consultora de estilo, Lu Moraes. Nos dias 29/5 (14h30 às 15h30) e 3/6 (17h30 às 19h30) ela estará disponível no evento para responder as dúvidas do público, com dicas de como se vestir bem sem gastar muito. Além disso, o público terá atualizações diárias as peças que estarão à venda no evento, pelo blog, criado dentro do site do Griffe Show (http://www.griffeshow.com.br/.

O evento conta ainda com uma praça de alimentação, com apresentações culturais e shows diariamente. São aceitos todos cartões de crédito.

11º Griffe Show
Data: 27 de maio a 13 de junho
Local: Minascentro (Entrada pela Rua Santa Catarina, 333, Centro, Belo Horizonte – MG)
Horários de funcionamento: 12h às 22h (segunda a sexta-feira) e 10h às 21h (sábado e domingo)
Ingresso: R$ 6,00 (inteira) e R$3,00 (meia)
Informações: (31) 3261.3930 e (31) 9616.9159 // www.griffeshow.com.br/

Siga o twitter do evento para concorrer a ingressos: www.twitter.com/griffeshow

Categoria: Eventos

4 Comentários to “Vem aí o 11° Griffe Show, em BH”

  1. Rafael disse:

    Alguem de vcs esteve la nesta edie7e3o? conetm pra gente! sempre fico sem saber, tem vez q esse evento eh tao furado mas ja estive em boas edie7oesbeijo

    • Pangat disse:

      There are two issues about the aclirte: (1) Are the results a valid answer to the question they were addressing, i.e., the Hispanic effect on crime? (2) Was the question itself the right question?Many of the criticisms in the comments confuse those two issues. They’re ostensibly addressing issue (1) but are actually relevant only to issue (2).All the comments about “who are Hispanics” – mestizo vs. other races, domestic vs. foreign born, etc. – are irrelevant to the question of the validity of La Griffe’s analysis. He defined “Hispanic” according to self-reporting on census forms, but he could have defined it as “anyone who likes burritos” and the analysis itself would have been just as valid, as long as those people were counted correctly. The distinctions among Hispanics – immigrant/natural citizen, racial, etc. – are completely irrelevant to the quality of the analysis. That’s the beauty of the method he’s using.The author does not assume that group crime rates are constant over different cities. He tests that hypothesis and claims to have established it empirically. He then assumes its truth in what follows. I think this is by far the biggest flaw in his analysis: The degree of confidence in that intermediate hypothesis is not reflected in his final confidence levels. This makes his final assertion practically meaningless, because the only valid thing he’s left with is point estimates.Other mistaken criticisms from the comments: “How do you explain [this exceptional case] then?” Answer: it’s an exceptional case.Paraphrasing: “By dismissing contrary data from the start, he just arrives at the destination he set out for.” He didn’t dismiss data, except for Honolulu. He analyzed a certain type of data, because there’s no way to statistically analyze Everything In The World. That’s a completely valid approach, and it’s clear that he might have arrived at the opposite conclusion if the data had been different. It’s also valid to ask, how does the conclusion fit with other evidence, including incarceration rates (answered by the author) and our proverbial lying eyes?But the “lying eyes” objection cuts both ways. If the author should explain the discrepancy between his conclusion and your lying eyes, then you critics are equally obliged to explain that discrepancy. Saying “his analysis must be wrong then,” or “lies, damned lies, and statistics,” is no more acceptable than saying “your lying eyes must be wrong.””[The hypothesis of constant crime rates by group] is demonstrably false.” Then why don’t you demonstrate that? Of course, any statistical model is “false,” in that it doesn’t explain 100 percent of the data. The author reports that r = 0.89, which means that his hypothesis explains about 80 percent of the variation in crime rates by city (excluding Honolulu). If he’s mistaken in that reasoning, then where is his mistake?Instead of arguing whether the aclirte is right or wrong, I’m interested in another question, which I have no idea how to answer: Can the obvious error in the analysis regarding confidence levels be fixed? Is there any way to get any valid confidence levels at all for the final point estimates? Maybe if there were someone with lots of resources at his disposal, a millionaire maybe, who was interested in the UNZ presentation…

    • Michel disse:

      有時覺得好好笑 見有不同版本的辱罵留言 不外乎環繞三兩樣老土到想嘔的事 例如 1. 你係咪搏出位呀 2. 點解你唔支持邊個邊個呀 ( 或點解你認為邊個唔應該得獎呀 )3. 幾時輪到你講說話呀 (eg: 不支持某偶像之類 )不同字眼 不同行文 不同潮語助興 不同角度漫罵 都是圍繞著上述三個方向 但我覺得奇怪 很多事情都有相對性 例如你支持歌星 A 相對地也會有人喜歡歌星 B 等於有人覺得 葉問 好看 但也會有人認為 武打片我一於唔睇囉 道理是類似的 退一步說 如果袁彌明表示 歌星 A好嘢 得獎無得頂 又會有相對歌星 B 的擁護者說一番道理 例如 歌星 A 不應得獎的一千個理由 又會說袁彌明沒眼光之類 又相反地 就算袁彌明支持歌星 A 歌星 A 的支持者 若果要找 罵袁彌明的一百個理由 也是不難的 例如講到口臭的爛籍口 擦鞋之嘛 或 又係搏上位囉 又或者推前一步 車 人地得獎 想攝位搏攞彩之嘛 林林種種 精彩絕倫 要從任何角度找刁難 要罵的總會給自己一千個合理註腳 *****不少歌手常說 歌是多人聽 但唱片銷量不見增多 何解 理由簡單 所謂 fan屎多籮籮 買唱片無邊幾個 fan屎買老翻多的是 偶像出場 聲嘶力竭 齊齊拍手 高呼叫好 在歌手竭盡所能高歌之同時 無數的所謂 Fan屎也忙於盤算 又有新翻版要買喇 奇趣至極 更如互相傳遞 ( 炒碟 copy ) 喜歡哪個歌星 買他/她的唱片就已是最佳的支持了 不同歌手有不同風格 你反歌星 A 是否又要同時反歌星 CDEFG 咁咪好唔得閒 而且最重要的是罵人者有一點是搞錯了 這是部落 ( blog ) 是個人的網上日誌 並非 反邊個大聯盟 部落主人在自己的部落說自己的意見 其他人不合意的 其實又可在自己部落大談 反袁 xx 一千個理由 確是可以這樣做的 袁彌明 blog 特別之處 就是她自己主理 並非娛樂公司人員例牌開設 當大家在 楊千樺 blog 或乜乜明星 blog 發表 我支持你啊 的時候 你估巨星真係咁得閒同你 reply thanks 咩 所以 罵袁彌明的人是很開心的 因為覺得 嘩 我咁都罵到佢喎 好嘢 這種既自悲又帶有挑戰的情緒 是平日平凡生活裡沒有的 罵人的留言者 你試下在街見到名人例如大劉 對他說 我睇你唔順眼囉 你估會點呢 你埋到去人家的 保鑣人牆 至算吧

  2. Devi disse:

    Vous me donnez le0 che8re amie, bien envie de lire les poe8mes de Ze9no Bianu dont je ne caonnis le nom qu au travers de la pre9sentation, de Haiku Anthologie du poe8me court japonais en poe9sie chez Gallimard et Haiku du XXe8me sie8cle, le poe8me court japonais d aujourd hui chez le meame e9diteur. Un poe8te e0 de9couvrir sans aucun doute et d une approche pas si aise9e qu il en paraeet. Est-ce que je me trompe ?- Par un ami cher je viens de lirea0 infiniment proche des poe8mes de9licats et forts de Ze9no Bianua0 chez l Arbale8te Gallimarda0 Je ne caonnissais justement que l anthologie dont vous parlezBel e9change en amitie9s

Deixe uma resposta